“Literature is the better part of life […] provided
life is the better part of literature.”
Wallace Stevens, From Adagia
The
document entitled Parent Findings &
Additional Proposed Guidelines for the Review and Approval of High School
Reading Materials (Proposed Guidelines)
has been carefully reviewed by the staff of Anoka-Hennepin High Schools. The
thoughtful ideas presented through thorough research are well-reasoned and the
issues raised are not taken lightly. It is the finding of the staff—the
Principle, the English teachers, the Library Media Specialists, the School Counselor,
and the School Board—that the novel Eleanor
and Park be removed from the summer reading list for 2013 but remains
allowed to be taught in the classroom under the careful supervision of
Literature Educators. The themes of love and hate, violence, sexuality, and
abuse of Eleanor and Park is
incredibly relevant to teenagers in our community, and the truths of these
difficult subjects transcend the nastiness of the language and the action of
the plot to a place of understanding, compassion, love, and acceptance for the
two protagonists of this particular novel.
Eleanor and Park is taught as a
contemporary realistic fiction that presents important issues of bullying,
developing sexual identity, verbal, sexual, and physical abuse clearly outlined
in the Proposed Guidelines. However,
it is precisely the realistic portrayal of these issues that is necessary for
the truths of the themes to reach our young adults who may struggle with life’s
ugly difficulties that cannot be censored. In discussing the importance of the
realistic fiction genre, Butcher and Hinton summarize Aronson’s argument in Exploring the Myths: The truth about
teenagers and reading: “[…] a writer of realistic fiction like a great
painter, must go beneath the surface of life to explore discontinuities,
examine the subconscious, and investigate unsettling truths. The results must
not be sugar-coated stories of perfect lives but frank examinations of the
choices young adults must make” (Butcher & Hinton 128). Within the context
of the English Literature classroom,
Eleanor & Park is an important example of the realistic fiction genre
that investigates unsettling truths of abuse and sexuality through shocking
realism. To censor the book is to sugar-coat the difficult issues our teenagers
face.
As
the Proposed Guidelines states, we
are confronted by the nasty language and sexually explicit themes within the
first chapter. Setting the opening scene on the bus situates the language and
the complexities of developing sexuality within the social structure of kids
themselves. Teenagers will swear and threaten each other, and they will grapple
with issues of romance and sex, and the consequences (e.g. pregnancy) thereof
as realistically painted in this first chapter (Rowell 5-9). Rainbow Rowell
creates this horrific scene for Eleanor’s entrance in the story as well as the
new kid in school. The 666 school bus (hell) as Eleanor states with devils such
as Tina (Rowell 10-11) is precisely the place where she will rise with Park
above the ugliness. In her online article “True Love, Book Fights, and Why Ugly
Stories Matter” by Linda Holmes, she states, “Ultimately, Eleanor & Park is an enormously optimistic book about love and connection, about the capacity
of people to be powerfully consoling and healing to each other, even when they’re
16. And for that healing to be
meaningful, there has to be some honesty about the injury” (Holmes). The stark
and realistic portrayal of nasty language and the sexual issues of teenagers is
necessary for the beauty that Eleanor and Park create through their love, which
is moral. Although they get real close to having intercourse, Park hesitates at
the end of the book for two important reasons: he doesn’t have a condom and he
doesn’t want to believe he’ll never see her again: “‘Eleanor, no, we have to
stop. […] I don’t even know how to…I don’t have anything. But I don’t want you
to get— […] I need to believe that it isn’t our last chance […] I need you to
believe it, too’” (Rowell 302-303). Showing maturity and real love for Eleanor,
Park fights his hormonal urges and finds the beauty and intelligence of making
the very important decision to abstain from sex. Protected sex and abstinence
are the important lessons here for our teenagers as they grapple with their own
immature hormonal tendencies for physical desire.
The
staff here at Anoka-Hennepin High School agree with the Proposed Guidelines on the issue that “it is possible for those
educators to have a disproportionate impact on the moral and societal views of
our children […] as the family unit continues to be eroded and children receive
less and less intentional instruction in these areas” (Proposed Guidelines). However, to be able to instruct in the moral
area of difficult and ugly subject matters, we as educators need to be as
strikingly honest as Rowell is with her novel Eleanor & Park. Referring to the NCTE Position Statement on The
Student’s Right to Read, “English Teachers forced through the pressures of
censorship to use only safe or antiseptic works are placed in the morally and
intellectually untenable position of lying to their students about the nature
and condition of mankind” (NCTE Position Statement).
The truths of the text Eleanor & Park
and the important truths of pedagogy far outweigh the aesthetically
displeasing nature of ugly and difficult subjects relevant to the lives of our
youth. Therefore, the staff here at
Anoka-Hennepin High School has decided to allow this novel to be taught in the
classroom under instruction, but we will remove it from the summer reading list
so as to not promote without instruction the ugliness of foul language and
sexual activity.
Works Cited
Aronson,
M. Exploring the Myths: The Truth about
teenagers and reading. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow (2001). As summarized in Bucher,
K. & Hinton, K. Young Adult
Literature: Exploration, Evaluation, and Appreciation 3rd
Edition. Boston: Pearson, 2014. Print.
Bucher,
K. & Hinton, K. Young Adult
Literature: Exploration, Evaluation, and Appreciation 3rd
Edition. Boston: Pearson, 2014. Print.
Holmes,
Linda. “True Love, Book Fights, and Why Ugly Stories Matter” Monkey See Pop Culture News and Analysis
from NPR. npr.org. National Public Radio. (18 September 2013). Online
article. http://www.npr.org/sections/monkeysee/2013/09/18/223738674/true-love-book-fights-and-why-ugly-stories-mattergly%20Stories%20Matter
NCTE
Position Statement. “The Students’
Right to Read.” ncte.org. National Council of Teachers of English. (November 2012).
Website. http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/righttoreadguideline
Parent Findings & Additional Proposed
Guidelines for the Review and Approval of High School Reading Materials. parentsactionleague.org. Parents Action League. (24th
July 2013). PDF. http://www.parentsactionleague.org/storage/post-images/Parent%20Findings%20and%20Additional%20Proposed%20Guidelines%20-%20130724%20v1_1.pdf
Rowell, Rainbow. Eleanor
& Park. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin, 2013. Print.
Stevens,
Wallace. Adagia. As quoted in: NCTE Position Statement. “The Students’ Right
to Read.” ncte.org. National Council of Teachers of English. (November 2012).
Website. http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/righttoreadguideline
I really found your response interesting and thoughtful. How interesting, yet frustrating it is to know this book was taken off a summer reading list due to its sensitive nature. While I do understand some of the apprehension about the topics listed, it is NO worse than what our youth sees on reality television or hear in any top 100 billboard song for the summer.
ReplyDeleteAnother point I would like to make it about the ease it would be to obtain this book. Assuming you have a student who likes to read--shocker, I know!--they could find Eleanor and Park on the Kindle store or any bookstore for many times it is listed in the top selling. Because of this, a student is more than likely able to read the content without it being in a school setting. So I am curious as to what school officials thought about? I guess they figure since they didn't put it on a summer reading list, parents cannot come back on the school with the backlash they are fearing they will receive.
I guess having a teacher give lessons about the novel and its important issues is better than being banned completely, but I cannot help but be sad for students who go to schools that shelter them from the ugly. As Holmes states in her article, we want to pretend the ugly isn't there, so we just ignore it. However, ignoring the horrors of society only dooms us to repeat it.
Great response! Loved reading what you had to say and it was all backed up with solid facts! :)
Keola,
ReplyDeleteThis may be tangential to your thoughtful response, but it came to me as I was reading it: Why do we, as a species, equate beauty with truth/honesty/goodness? I ran a search and received 3,550,000 search results. I won’t get into the biology of this question, but the psychology of it intrigued me a bit. Eleanor and Park are portrayed to us as “outliers” of sorts, physically speaking, but they are drawn to each other in a way that defies conventional thinking (if the scientific studies are to be believed) on the subject of beauty. I know that different cultures value different physical traits than say, Western cultures, but in Eleanor & Park, I think we see this idea turned on its head. What could be more beautiful than a good friend?
Keola,
ReplyDeleteI like how you brought up realistic literature. We teach books like Night, Boy in the Striped Pajamas, Ann Frank, which are all great books, but they don't have direct implications on our students' lives. The events that they portray are certainly realistic and often disturbing, but they are not "contemporary" problems that our students will be dealing with in their schools or adult life, hopefully. We need to focus on literature that is contemporary and applicable to students everyday.
The fact that you contrasted the beauty of the love in Eleanor and Park with the vulgarity is great. We need parents to see that language does not dictate whether a novel has deep and meaningful things to say. As you say, the truths in the novel far outweigh its moralistic shortcomings, which aren't actually shortcoming because Rowell is trying to make a point.
Also, you have a really nice use of sources here. Great research.