Eleanor
and Park: Analyzing
Teenage Love Through the Novel’s Complex Situations
Many educators are reluctant to
teach seemingly simple texts with fear their students will not gain the
superior educational experience they desire the pupils to have. Novels such as Great Expectations or To Kill a Mockingbird hold great value
in English classrooms. Teachers may believe contemporary young adult (YA)
novels are mundane or fail to exhibit the complexities novels need to thoroughly
evaluate students’ knowledge. However, with the new push to introduce YA novels
in the classroom, teachers are finding themselves hustling to build a library
of age-appropriate YA novels for their students to dive into. Rainbow Rowell’s
novel, Eleanor and Park, showcases
how beautiful young love can be whilst the characters are in the mix of intense
personal situations they struggle with daily. Furthermore, Eleanor and Park
both share a deep connection that is limited by their familial circumstances
that many students can find relevance in, even given the 30 years difference
between the published date and the current society. I assert Eleanor and Park’s
newfound love is what makes this novel relatable in the classroom, while the complicated
social issues both characters face gives the novel its complexity teachers need
to have in their literature classes.
The sense of helplessness and being
lost runs wild throughout Eleanor and
Park as both young teens journey through a world of adversity. Eleanor is
poor and has been introduced to a home life where she feels unloved and
unwanted. While Park is fortunate enough to have a loving family, he feels like
an outcast due to his ethnicity and later his love for Eleanor. In an article
by Linda Holmes, she points out that Eleanor and Park’s teenage love “makes
them feel less lost” (Holmes, “True Love”). While many of the issues the
characters face in the novel might be inappropriate for middle school readers,
I do believe many high school students would relate immensely to the idea of
one’s first love. High school is a tough transition for many young adults; the
new idea that one isn’t a child anymore because they have four years left
before the real world, gaining some ground on their identity, and experiencing
those around them as potential love interests makes many individuals feel lost
and alone. It is easy to believe that finding one person who clicks with you on
every level, and an attraction is mutually share among the two, would help any high
schooler feel complete and safe. Readers can see Eleanor and Park experiencing one
another in new ways during an intense intimate moment in Park’s parents’
house. Rowell describes Park’s desire
for Eleanor to touch him “like a cat who pushes its head under your hands” as
Eleanor “brought her hands down Park’s chest with her fingertips” (Rowell,
250). This new and lustful love the two share makes many adult readers today reminisce
about their first boyfriend or girlfriend and what it was like to be placed in
an intimate situation for the first time. The way Rowell depicts the encounter
between the two as “awkward” in comparison to how “in movies, [intimate
relations] happens smoothly or comically” (Rowell, 250). This situation will
have teenagers thinking closely to their own relationships they are currently
in, or have experience already in the past. The ability to relate to a
situation is what makes the novel work in the classroom—it helps keep the
students engaged in what they are reading and they are able to compare what is
going on in the text to their own lives. This is one aspect that allows
teachers to use YA novels as a tool for complex thinking.
Teachers want students to read a
text and analyze complex issues as a method of assessing higher order thinking.
As stated before, one of the biggest arguments about YA novels are the lack of
complexities embedded into the storyline. Contrary to this belief, Eleanor and Park not only exhibits
conflict, but also very intense and difficult situations that teachers can use
for deep instruction. While the controversies that are describe in the novel
are tough and sensitive, students can practice empathy and critical thinking
about these issues in the context of Eleanor and Park’s young romance. For
example, Rowell lets the readers into Eleanor and Park’s intimate scenario when
Park asks Eleanor if their relationship is “going to be weird now” and Eleanor
replies, “only for a minute, only a little” (Rowell, 253). The encounter they
both experienced together is new, it is complex because neither knows what to think
about what happened besides they care for one another—Park even explicated tells
Eleanor during it that he loves her—and that they both feel pleasure from being
touched. Rowell lets the situation become even deeper as the readers peer into
Eleanor’s fears that she might “never [have] the chance to touch him like this
again” (Rowell, 250). The readers are forced to think about Eleanor’s home life
and how each day with Park might be the last; this is partly due to her
stepfather being increasingly more violent towards Eleanor, leaving her with
the choice to stay and endure potential death/rape or to run away and find safety
with her aunt and uncle in Minnesota. The readers are able to see the struggles
both Park, and especially Eleanor, face internally and externally. Their
relationship becomes more complex as it develops more romantically throughout
the chapters.
Rowell’s Eleanor and Park gives adults an inside advantage of teenage
struggles all while providing an outlet for those same teens to feel not so
alone. This novel works very well in a classroom because of its content and
deep rooted issues the characters are forced to deal with. It is because of the
sensitive nature of the novel that students can feel they aren’t alone in their
search for a better life or knowing their true identity. The love Eleanor and
Park share can be transmitted for young adults in their own romantic
relationships by Rowell providing a detailed explanation of the two characters
as individuals and as a romantic pair. Teachers are able to use YA novels like Eleanor and Park to meet state
standards, engage their students with an interesting storyline, and analyzing
complex issues and ideas found in the novel. Through the relationship we watch
unfold between the two, Eleanor and Park leave the readers with many questions
about the future of the relationship, but ultimately hope that both are better
because of the experiences they had while in each other’s presence.
Works Cited
Holmes, Linda. “True Love, Book Fights, and Why Ugly Stories
Matter.” NPR. NPR, 18 Sept. 2013. Web. 31
May 2016. http://www.npr.org/sections/monkeysee/2013/09/18/223738674/true-love-book-fights-and-why- ugly-stories-matter
Rowell, Rainbow. Eleanor
and Park. New York, St. Martin’s Press, 2013. Print.
Ugh, how annoying. Sorry my citations are messed up. They look nice in my word document if that makes it any better!
ReplyDeleteDon't worry about the formatting getting messed up here. It is no big deal!
ReplyDeleteMariah, great discussion of showing the text complexity in plot. Sex in fiction is a sensitive issue with parents, and always will be; therefore your discussion weighs in on our discussion of censorship in class today. Taking a sensitive issue and presenting not only the complexities of the emotions of sex teenagers feel, I find your argument compelling in that this scene also calls to other difficult issues these teens are facing such as Eleanor's stepdad. Rowell does not treat teenage sex lightly, which is very important to the theme as well as text complexity. Furthermore, the fact that the two teens don't end up having sex and why they don't I find incredibly important as well to the issue of teenage sex this novel raises--at the end it is Park who does not consent because he doesn't have a condom and because he wants to believe that they can wait for the future--two very good reasons as to why kids should not have sex in the heat of the moment--especially crazy emotional moments like the one at the end. Good discussion with text complexity and theme complexity and how the two interweave.
ReplyDeleteMariah,
ReplyDeleteAs a class, we’ve discussed so many aspects of this book. I read your response and thought about what you’d written. Here’s what you managed to help me see: Maybe YA lit writers figured out that the best way to persuade their audience is through the use of clear and simple language, even though the intent behind the stories is far more complex. The intended audience needs, even craves, an honest discussion about life and all its foibles. That’s the service I see YA lit fulfilling, when it’s good.
Mariah,
ReplyDeleteIn the English Education world, this would be a book that we call "low vocab high content." I am glad you made a case for such books in the classroom because they are especially important with the rise of UDL. Oftentimes, I think of "low vocab, high content" in the form of graphic novels, but you're right that this same dynamic can be found in straightforward texts as well--something I often forget.
I will often find myself saying things like "I could teach To Kill a Mockingbird and then give certain students the graphic novel version of that book if their IEP states the need for certain accommodations," but I don't always thing in terms like "this one book is already universal enough that I may not need to make other accommodations for struggling readers." But this is something we should all be aware of: UDL doesn't have to mean several versions of the same content, UDL can mean one singular text that is low enough in vocab to be understood by struggling readers, and high enough in content to capture the interest of proficient readers. I am glad you brought up this point, it is something I need to be more aware of in the future.