Response
#1 Prompt #5: Pairing The Catcher in the
Rye with Great Expectations
I must admit that I am continually
on the fence regarding the “young adult v. classics” debate. My Bachelor’s
degree in literature suggests that I should undoubtedly endorse the classics,
yet this may not always be the best option for the students. A partnership of
the two, therefore, could effectively engage students in the content while still
satisfying an academic need for complexity. In this way, J.D. Salinger’s young
adult novel The Catcher in the Rye could
be paired with Charles Dickens’ classic novel, Great Expectations; by allowing students to read two separate novels
with a familiar protagonist, the students may then feel more comfortable
exploring other components of the text, such as plot, narration, environment,
and supporting characters, thereby absorbing a better understanding of the all-around
text without clinging to the novel’s narrator at face value.
Too often, students become so enthralled
with the protagonist of a story that they ignore all of the other literary
components the author has added to their novel, creating a situation where the
student loses valuable content and the teacher loses an opportunity to fulfill
multiple state standards with ease. These two main characters will absolutely
be discussed in termed of their similarities, but my eliminating our societal
need to focus entirely on the protagonist, students will become more aware of
the text as a whole. This familiar protagonist will also make a comparative analysis
accessible for even the most reluctant readers. Holden and Pip seem very similar, but their many complexities are exceedingly
different. This means that the reluctant reader will easily grasp Holden and
Pip’s similarities with an inviting hand in which the teacher can then guide
into the realm of contrasting characteristics—a terrain the student would not
have explored otherwise. Reading two novels of this size may sound like a lot
of work for the English classroom, but consider the wide array of core content
areas that can be addressed once the student is able to look past the singular,
familiar male protagonist.
In the English classroom, it is the
teacher’s responsibility to teach a variety of literary elements including (but
not limited to) the use of plot, and narrative structure. The Catcher in the Rye and Great
Expectations sit on two opposite ends of the plot spectrum. Seemingly a
story of aimlessness, Holden Caulfield of the
Catcher in the Rye gives his readers no real indication as to where he is
going, what he is trying to accomplish, or what the end goal may be for his
story, compiling a story of high content, but little plot. Comparatively, with
secret benefactors, murder mysteries, and a goal to become a gentleman, Great Expectations provides enough plot
to fill a novel twice its size as Pip learns how to be successful with his
newfound wealth. Both young boys sharing a similar attitude, it becomes easier for
the students to understand how one character archetype can experience such
widely different stories with the use of different creative writing techniques.
Also in this way, the reader may understand how this similar archetype can be
created within two texts with very different styles of narration: Holden is
blunt, foul, and informal with his narration while Pip is formal and
self-critiquing, yet both produce the same feeling of animosity in the reader
towards their narration.
By reading two novels, such as The Catcher in the Rye and Great Expectations, the students will
have significantly more opportunities to look past the main character and delve
into an intro of literary theory. Take, for example, the relationship between
Holden and Sally, and Pip and Estella. Both boys find themselves (at least
temporarily) in love with girls who don’t actually seem compatible with their
personalities. Holden sees Sally and is suddenly overwhelmed with the idea of
her:
She
looked terrific, she really did….The funny part is, I felt like marrying her
the minute I saw her. I’m crazy. I didn’t even like her much, and yet all of a sudden I felt like I was in love
with her and wanted to marry her. I swear to God I’m crazy. I admit it.
(Salinger, 162)
Holden
recognizes that his infatuation with Sally is unrealistic. Later, Holden sporadically
asks Sally to run away with him without even realizing that he didn’t actually want her to do so. Holden is driven
primarily by hormones and by his self-destructive impulse, making it
all-but-impossible for him to let himself become emotionally attached to a
girl. Instead, he opts to objectify women like Sally and write them off as
stupid as a way to mask his own personal struggles. By making everyone else a
victim, he keeps himself safe. Similarly, Pip also shares an infatuation with
Estella that seems to be only skin-deep:
The
unqualified truth is, that even when I loved Estella with the love of a man, I
loved her simply because I found her irresistible. Once for all; I knew to my
sorrow, often and often, if not always, that I loved her against reason,
against promise, against peace, against hope, against happiness, against all
discouragement that could be. (Dickens, 179)
Pip
is given very little reason to love Estella. She is cruel to him and looks down
upon him for his socioeconomic status. Pip nonetheless carries his infatuation
of Estella throughout the majority of the novel, sometimes to the utmost confusion
of the readers. Where both Pip and Holden have an attraction toward the
aesthetically pleasing girl, Holden degrades Sally and chastises himself for
giving into his emotions while Pip holds onto his dream of Estella with the
hope that his genuine emotions and perseverance may one day bring him
happiness.
When providing such examples to
readers, there are a variety of questions (prompts) that the teacher could
distribute to get their students thinking beyond the obvious:
1. Could
the relationships between Holden and Sally and Pip and Estella be a stand-in
for Holden and Pip’s relationship with money?
2. What
does it mean that both Sally and Estella are seemingly objectified to oblige in
the protagonists’ with little to no regard for the girls’ emotions? Review how
Holden and Pip interact with other women in the text to draw your own
conclusions as to how these characters value women and see their role in
society.
3. As
shown by the above passages, Holden can be classified as a cynic in an American
novel and Pip more close identifies as a romantic in a British novel. Use the
novels’ setting and time period to see how Holden’s and Pip’s environment may
have shaped their outlooks on life and love.
When
discussing and understanding young adult literature in the classroom, it is
unfair to judge a book by its genre, and it is disingenuous to judge a student’s
ability by the classics. By pairing J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye with Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations, it becomes clear that pairing young adult
literature with classic literature is an innovatively collaborative way to get
students thinking critically while remaining engaged in the discussion. Weather
a teacher chooses to use the paring listed, or one entirely different, the
ideas presented within this response are flexible and universal to fit all ELA
teaching needs to be beneficial to both student and educator.
Work Cited
Dickens,
Charles. Great Expectations. New
York: Norton, 1992. Print.
Salinger,
J. D. The Catcher in the Rye. New
York: Back Bay, 2001. Print.
Shelby,
ReplyDeleteI have always wanted to have a class where we could take an entire year and only read novels that are very similar to one another--such as with The Catcher in the Rye and Great Expectations. I think the benefit of having a common theme teaches students to find similarities and differences between texts that are written around the same time, and even texts that are written in completely different times. However, your point is correct about time is of the essence! It is hard to get through novels at a decent rate, while still being able to teach foundational elements of English Language Arts. However, I think one way of doing this would be to do 2 small groups where one group would focus on Great Expectations while the other on The Catcher in the Rye. Both groups would then present their information effectively and with great detail, then the class could come together and discuss the similarities and differences, cultural context, perspective, etc.
You can also incorporate elements such as plot, point of view, parts of speech, etc with novels alone, instead of the typical (and boring) worksheets or grammar books. The application of those literary devices might help the students remember what they are and how to find them!
I love your analysis of the two. Good job! It is interesting and makes me want to reread Great Expectations!!
Shelby,
ReplyDeleteI think pairing Great Expectations with Catcher in the Rye is a very interesting idea. It definitely seems like a great way to get students to look beyond the protagonist and to examine the deeper themes within a novel. You nail it on the head when you say that students just pay attention to the character and ignore the deeper concepts that surround the novel. Perhaps it is just a developmental factor in the rate of maturation for teenagers, but they often seem to miss huge parts of the text because they are so involved in what the character is doing.
I like how you put two very different texts together: one with a lot of plot and one with a wandering plot. That in itself could take an entire semester of exploring what makes a novel great that has a "great" plot and what makes another novel great when its plot is less concrete? I would have never thought about that way to analyze texts, but that is a great way to examine these novels.
I think the examples you gave of the text are moving as well. One of the biggest challenges we will have as teachers is finding examples to show and your examples are right on the money. Great job.